שטוטאקוי, אתר מאמרים אישי

Journalists` copyrights are protected by international treaties and national laws. These rights include not only the economic rights (the right to earn money from a creative work) of the authors, but also their moral rights. Moral rights are guaranteed by national laws. To achieve these objectives, the IGE and its international partners collaborated to develop the International Declaration on the Protection of Journalists, which brings together international principles for the protection of journalists working in hazardous environments, stressed the responsibility of States in ensuring the safety of journalists and the fight against impunity, and stresses the measures and measures to be taken, media organizations and journalists should consider going further. Security. States shall reflect their commitment to media freedom and the safety of journalists in their foreign and assistance policies and shall use bilateral and multilateral forums to exert pressure on counterparties that do not comply with their international obligations with regard to the safety of all journalists, media professionals and associated personnel working within their borders, or those responsible for attacks on the media, to continue the prosecutions that take place on their territory. The international declaration is based on in-depth research and analysis of existing international mechanisms on the safety of journalists, as well as best practices of journalists and media organisations to ensure maximum security. All journalists, media professionals and associated personnel have the right to protection from all human rights violations and violations, including through killing, torture, enforced disappearances, arbitrary arrest and detention, expulsion, intimidation, harassment, threats and other forms of violence, de facto or de jure discrimination against herself and members of her family or any other arbitrary act that would result from the exercise of the rights mentioned in this declaration. conditions, including unlawful or arbitrary surveillance or surveillance of communications that infringe their rights to privacy and freedom of expression.

But now we assume that source B received its information from source A. According to the court`s analysis, source B`s information was “provided” by source A. Given that this information is disclosed in the journalist`s story, it appears, as a result of this analysis, that journalists have breached the agreement with source A, that he does not appear to be using the information she provided. It is based on international human rights and laws and mechanisms for the protection of journalists, including resolutions, declarations, treaties, conventions, general commentaries and other statements by international organizations. . . .